Blocking Buffers for Western Blot and ELISA | Thermo Fisher Scientific

Before using antibodies to detect proteins that have been dotted or transferred to a membrane, the remaining binding surface must be blocked to prevent the non-specific binding of the antibodies. Otherwise, the antibodies or other detection reagents will bind to any remaining sites that initially served to immobilize the proteins of interest. In principle, any protein that does not have binding affinity for the target protein or probe components (antibodies) in the assay can be used for blocking. In practice, however, certain proteins perform better than others because they bind to the membrane or other immobilization surface more consistently or because they stabilize the function of other system components.

Explore: Western blot blocking buffers Western Blot Protocols

Purpose and function of blocking steps

The membrane supports, such as nitrocellulose and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), used in western blotting have a high affinity for proteins. To prevent non-specific binding of detection antibodies during the steps following transfer, unoccupied sites on the membrane surface must be blocked. Blocking buffer formulations vary widely and may contain milk, normal serum, or highly purified proteins to block free membrane sites. The blocking step is imperative and improves the signal-to-noise ratio of the assay by reducing background interference. Inadequate amounts of blocker result in excessive background noise and a reduced signal-to-noise ratio; in contrast, excessive concentrations of blocker may mask antibody-antigen interactions or inhibit the marker enzyme, which causes a reduction of the target signal.

Types of blocking buffers

Several types of blocking buffers have been successfully used in western blotting. A majority of western blot blocking buffers are inert solutions of either mixed proteins or a single purified protein that ideally have little to no interaction with the detection antibodies or antigens on the blot. Typically, blocking agents are diluted in either Tris-buffered saline (TBS) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), with or without detergent. Detergents, such as Tween-20, can be added to the blocking buffer to further reduce non-specific binding. The amount of Tween-20 (0.05%-0.2%) will vary depending on the strength of the antibodies used. Weak-binding antibodies may be washed away by too much detergent in subsequent washes.

Blocking Buffer/Agent	Benefits	Considerations
2-5% Non-fat milk	Inexpensive, contains multiple types of proteins	Contains biotin and phosphoproteins, which can interfere with streptavidin-biotin detection strategies and detection of phosphorylated target proteins. Due to the number of proteins within milk, milk may mask some antigens and lower the detection limit of the western blot.
2-3% Bovine serum albumin (BSA)	Good alternative to milk, can be used in biotin-streptavidin systems or when probing for phosphoproteins	Various grades of BSA are commercially available that can impact signal-to-noise. BSA is generally a weaker blocker, which can result in more non-specific antibody binding, but can increase the detection sensitivity for low-abundant proteins.
Purified proteins (e.g., casein)	Single-protein blocking buffers can provide fewer chances of cross-reaction with assay components than serum or milk solutions. Ideal when blockers, such as non-fat milk, block antigen-antibody binding	More expensive than traditional non-fat milk formulations.

Which blocking buffer to use?

Selection of blocking buffer for western blotting applications is often system-dependent. Determining the proper blocking buffer can help to increase the system’s signal-to-noise ratio. Occasionally, when switching from one substrate to another, the blocking buffer may need to be changed in order to avoid problems with diminished signal or increased background. For example, with applications using an alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugate, a blocking buffer in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) should be selected because phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) interferes with AP activity. Empirically testing various blocking buffers for use with a given system can help achieve the best possible results. No single blocking agent is ideal for every application because each antibody-antigen pair has unique characteristics.

The accompanying figures illustrate the value of testing different blocking buffers as part of western blotting optimization. In these example experiments, in which all other conditions were equal, different blocking buffers quenched or enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of the western blot for individual proteins. In other cases, weak blocking buffers might cause non-specific bands.

Western blot images of the detection of pAKT using different blocking buffers, 2% BSA, 5% non-fat milk, and StartingBlock blocking buffer.

Click image to enlarge

Comparison between 2% BSA, 5% NF-Milk and StartingBlock Blocking Buffer in the detection of pAKT. Method: A dilution series of 293T cell lysate starting at 10 μg/well was loaded onto Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris-Plus gels and electrophoresed at 200 V for ~20 min. Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlot 2 Gel Transfer Device (P0 protocol for 7 min). Immunoblotting was processed using the Bandmate Automated Western Blot Processor. Membranes were blocked with either 2% BSA (PBS), 5% Non-fat Milk (PBS), or StartingBlock Blocking Buffer. The membranes were probed with Rabbit Anti-pAKT (1:1,000, Cat. No. MA5-14916) diluted in the appropriate blocking buffer. This was followed by an incubation with HRP-conjugated Goat Anti–Rabbit IgG (1:2,500 or 0.04 µg/mL, Cat. No. 32460). Chemiluminescence detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate. Membranes were imaged on the iBright Imaging System.

In the detection of pAKT in 293T cell lysates, 2% BSA and StartingBlock Blocking Buffer provided the highest sensitivity. However, 2% BSA weakly blocked non-specific binding from the detection antibodies, which is seen with the non-specific banding patterns at higher total lysate load. 5% NF-Milk provided the lowest background, but at a cost to the limit of detection.

Western blot images of the detection of Hsp90 using different blocking buffers, 5% BSA, 5% non-fat milk, casein and StartingBlock blocking buffer.

Click image to enlarge

Method: A dilution series of 293T cell lysate starting at 10 μg/well was loaded onto Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris-Plus gels and electrophoresed at 200 V for ~20 min. Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlot 2 Gel Transfer Device (P0 protocol for 7 min). Immunoblotting was processed using the Bandmate Automated Western Blot Processor. Membranes were blocked with either 5% BSA (PBS), 5% Non-fat Milk (PBS), 1% Casein (PBS) or StartingBlock Blocking Buffer. The membranes were probed with Rabbit Anti-Hsp90 (1:5,000, Cat. No. MA1-10372) diluted in the appropriate blocking buffer. This was followed by an incubation with HRP-conjugated Goat Anti–Rabbit IgG (1:1,000 or 0.01µg/mL Cat. No. 32460). Chemiluminescence detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate. Membranes were imaged on the iBright Imaging System.

In the detection of highly abundant, Hsp90 in 293T cell lysates, all blocking buffers tested provided reasonable signal-to-noise ratios. 5% BSA exhibited a higher level of non-specific binding from the detection antibodies, but provided good sensitivity.

Fluorescent western blotting considerations

Particles and contaminants in blocking and wash buffers can settle on membranes and create fluorescent artifacts, so it’s important to use high-quality, filtered buffers in fluorescent western blotting. In addition, limit the use of detergents during blocking steps, as common detergents can auto-fluoresce, possibly increasing non-specific background.

Western blot detection of EGRF, Stat2 and Ras10 using different blocking buffers, Blocker FL buffer and 5% non-fat milk.

Click image to enlarge

Method: A dilution series of A431 cell lysate starting at 15 μg/well was loaded onto Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris-Plus gels and electrophoresed at 200 V for ~20 min. Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlot 2 Gel Transfer Device (P0 protocol for 7 min). Membranes were blocked with either Blocker FL Blocking Buffer, 5% non-fat Milk (TBS) or another specialty blocking buffer. The membranes were probed with anti-EGFR, anti-Stat3, or anti-Ras10, diluted in the appropriate blocking buffer. This was followed by an incubation with Alexa Fluor Plus 800-conjugated Goat Anti–Rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor Plus 680 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG. Membranes were imaged on the iBright Imaging System.

Recommended Thermo Scientific western blot blocking buffers

Select when	Thermo Scientific product	Blocking agent	Highlights	When to use	Available formats
Chemiluminescent western blotting
Optimizing a new western blot system	StartingBlock Blocking Buffer	Single purified protein, serum- and biotin-free	Performs well with a wide range of antibodies and antibody combinations Compatible with streptavidin systems Blocks in less than 15 minutes	Current blocking buffer has high background or blocking antigen-antibody binding Stripping and reprobing western blots	PBS TBS PBST TBST
Traditional blockers not providing enough sensitivity	Blocker Casein	Purified casein	High-performance replacement for homemade milk blocking buffers Single-protein blocking buffer provides fewer chances of cross-reaction with assay components than serum or milk solutions	Targeting med-high abundant proteins or using antibodies with strong affinity High background is seen with Non-fat milk blockers	PBS TBS
Targeting phosphoproteins or need highest level of sensitivity	Blocker BSA	Purified BSA	10% solution of high-quality BSA Single purified protein provides fewer chances of cross-reaction with assay components than serum or milk solutions	Use when targeting phosphoproteins Best to use when storing reused antibodies in blocker	10X PBS concentrate 10X TBS concentrate
Fluorescent western blotting
Performing fluorescent western detection	Blocker FL Fluorescent Blocking Buffer (10x)	Single purified protein	Blocks excess non-specific binding sites to help reduce background fluorescence Works with both nitrocellulose and low-fluorescence PVDF membranes Detergent-free Blocks in 15-30 minutes	Imaging and storage of dry fluorescence blots	10X concentrate

Additional available blocking buffers

	Blocking agent	Highlights	When to use	Available formats
Pierce Clear Milk Blocking Buffer	Clarified and stabilized milk proteins	High-performance replacement for homemade milk blocking buffers Long shelf-life at room temperature	Use when high background seen with Non-fat milk Fluorescent and chemiluminescent applications	Borate, pH 7.6
Fish Serum Blocking Buffer	Steelhead salmon serum	Useful in detection methods involving mammalian samples Particularly effective in applications involving multiplex fluorescence imaging	With mammalian samples Multiplexing fluorescence western blotting	PBS
SuperBlock Blocking Buffer	Serum- and biotin-free single purified glycoprotein	Protein-based formulation does not contain any immunoglobulins, albumin, or endogenous biotin, making it compatible in many situations where traditional blocking agents fail Biotin-free for use with streptavidin system Blocks in less than 10 minutes	High background with current blocking buffer	PBS TBS PBST TBST
Blocker BLOTTO	Non-fat dry milk	Ready-to-use 5% solution of nonfat powdered milk	Convenient- ready-to-use More consistent product over home-made blockers	TBS
Protein-Free Blocking Buffer	Non-protein blocking compound	Minimizes or eliminates cross-reactivity associated with protein-based blocking buffers. Sample-and-antibody combinations require the elimination of all possible exogenous animal proteins in the assay system to avoid cross-reaction or quenching of the desired probe function	Use when protein-based blockers cause high background or provide desired probe function	PBS TBS PBST TBST
Pierce Fast Blocking Buffer	Single purified protein	Blocks in 5 minutes	When time is essential	TBS