Knowing the temperature of a sample within the RF coil of an NMR spectrometer is important when conducting kinetics or reaction monitoring experiments. Measuring the temperature of an NMR sample can be accomplished by direct methods, such as placing a temperature probe within the sample, or by monitoring the chemical shift dependence on sample temperature. The microbore capillary probe and magnet design of the Thermo Scientific picoSpin 45 NMR spectrometer precludes the possibility of using a direct method. However, in molecules like methanol and ethylene glycol, the chemical shift of the hydroxyl proton (OH) is strongly dependent on the extent of hydrogen bonding present. As the sample temperature is changed so too is the amount of hydrogen bonding, thus affecting the amount of shielding the nucleus experiences and resulting in changes in observed chemical shift. At low temperatures, where more hydrogen bonding is present in the sample, a downfield shift of the hydroxyl signal is observed while the chemical shift of the aliphatic signal remains unaffected. The chemical shift temperature probe method is commonly used in NMR and has been well studied by Van Geet and others.1,2,3,4
By using a chemical shift thermometer we are able to independently determine the temperature of methanol (CH3OH) and ethylene glycol (HOCH2CH2OH) samples within the RF coil of the capillary probe and make comparisons to thermistor sensor readings of the magnet temperature (as displayed on the Temperature page of the picoSpin-45 NMR spectrometer software). By this method we can generate temperature calibration curves for the displayed magnet temperature over the full operating temperature range of the picoSpin 45 NMR spectrometer.
All spectra were acquired from neat, reagent grade samples of methanol and ethylene glycol dried over calcium sulfate, using a 90 degree pulse angle and a 10 s T1 recovery delay; all spectra are the average of 16 scans. Spectra were obtained for six different magnet set-point temperatures and at 5 degree increments in the range of 20-45 °C.
Figure 1 shows the chemical shift dependence of the OH signal in methanol on varying sample temperature. At high magnet temperature (45 °C) the hydroxyl signal, experiencing less hydrogen bonding, appears upfield at δ4.5 whereas at the lower temperature limit (20 °C) the hydroxyl protons resonate further downfield (δ5.15); the CH3 appears at δ3.45.
The chemical shift dependence on temperature, derived originally by Van Geet1,2 for methanol at 60 MHz, is a quadratic function over the temperature range of the initial study (-53 – 57 °C) and is presented here in generalized form (Eq. 1), allow for scaling to different magnetic field strengths.
(1) T(°C) = 129.85 – (29.46/Tx) |∆ν| – (23.832/Tx2) ∆v2
Here Tx is the transmit frequency of the RF coil in MHz, T is the sample temperature in Celsius, and ∆ν is the frequency separation of the hydroxyl (OH) and methyl (CH3) groups in Hz. Although Equation 1 describes a quadratic function, the quadratic term is sufficiently small such that over the experimental temperature range of 25°C the data from Figure 1 can be fitted to a straight line as described by Equation 2.
(2) T(°C) = 166.19 – 2.0234 ∆ν
Like methanol, the response to changes in hydrogen bonding in ethylene glycol upon changing sample temperature is manifest in the chemical shift behavior of the OH signal. In Figure 2 the methylene resonance appears centered at δ4.0, while the hydroxyl signal shifts from a high temperature chemical shift value of δ5.4 to a low temperature downfield value of δ5.75. Van Geet found the downfield ‘walk’ of the hydroxyl signal with decreasing temperature for ethylene glycol to be nearly perfectly linear over a 100 degree temperature range (37-137 °C), and thus approximated this behavior by a linear function.2
(3) T(°C) = 192.85 – (101.64/Tx) ∆ν
The experimental data from Figure 2 demonstrates a similar linear response to changes in sample temperature. A fit of the chemical shift separation between OH and CH2plotted against magnet sensor temperature yields.
(4) T(°C) = 177.84 – 2.0709 ∆ν ,
where ∆ν is the frequency separation of the hydroxyl (OH) and methyl (CH2) groups in Hz. Equation 4 shows good agreement with Van Geet’s equation (3).
The relationship between the magnet temperature sensor reading displayed on the Temperature page of the picoSpin-45 NMR spectrometer software page and the observed chemical shift between the aliphatic and hydroxyl proton signal of the chemical probes can be seen in Figure 3. The error bars represent the observed error between the displayed magnet temperature and the temperature calculated from the difference in chemical shifts. The displayed and calculated temperatures show agreement to within 1 °C, demonstrating the accuracy of the picoSpin 45 spectrometer’s temperature monitoring sensor.
References
1 Van Geet, A. L. Anal. Chem., 1970, 42, 679-680.
2 Van Geet, A. L. Anal. Chem., 1968, 40, 2227-2229.
3 Raiford, D.S.; Fisk, C. L.; Becker. E. D. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 2050-2051.
4 Sikorski, W. H.; Sanders, A. W.; Reich, H. J. Magn. Reson. Chem.1998, 36, S118-S124.