Introduction
Small Interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are short double-stranded RNA molecules that can target and degrade complementary mRNAs via a cellular process termed RNA interference (RNAi). Alternate methods for generating siRNA are: (i) vector based in vivo expression, (ii) chemical synthesis, (iii) in vitro transcription (IVT), (iv) RNAse III mediated hydrolysis and (v) PCR based siRNA expression cassettes. We have evaluated these diverse methodologies and found them to offer varying advantages over one another.
Small Interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are short double-stranded RNA molecules that can target and degrade complementary mRNAs via a cellular process termed RNA interference (RNAi). Alternate methods for generating siRNA are: (i) vector based in vivo expression, (ii) chemical synthesis, (iii) in vitro transcription (IVT), (iv) RNAse III mediated hydrolysis and (v) PCR based siRNA expression cassettes. We have evaluated these diverse methodologies and found them to offer varying advantages over one another.
Chemical synthesis | RNase III digestion of dsRNA | siRNA Expression Vector | PCR Expression Cassette | In vitro transcription | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements | 2 21-mer RNA oligos | Transcription template (200-800 bp region flanked by T7 promoters) | 2 55-60-mer DNA oligos | 2 ~55-mer DNA oligos | 2 29-mer DNA oligos |
Turnaround time (total preparation/synthesis time) | 4 days to 2 weeks* | 1 day + transcription template preparation time | 5+ days + DNA oligo | ~ 6 hours + DNA oligo | 24 hours + DNA oligo |
Hands on time | Little to none* | Moderate | High | Moderate | Moderate |
Testing to find optimal siRNA sequence | Required | Not needed | Required | Required | Required |
Ability to label siRNA (i.e., for analyzing siRNA uptake or localization by fluorescence microscopy) | No | No | Yes | ||
Relative ease of transfection | Good | Fair | Good | Good | |
Selectability (i.e, antibiotic selection) | No | ||||
Useful for long term studies | No | No | Yes, with selection | No | No |
Ability to scale up synthesis | Yes | Limited | Yes | Limited | Limited |
Monitor transfection efficiency of entire population | No | No | Yes | No | No |
Relative cost per gene (not including labor) | High | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
*Depends on purification/deprotection options selected and format (e.g., annealed and ready to transfect versus single strands supplied lyophilized)
Summary
Vector based in vivo expression:
Chemical and IVT synthesis:
RNase III mediated hydrolysis:
PCR based siRNA expression cassettes:
- Permits long-term and stable gene silencing
- Possibility to use inducible/repressible markers
- Use of viral vectors
Chemical and IVT synthesis:
- Allows rapid screening of multiple targets
- High siRNA homogeneity and purity
RNase III mediated hydrolysis:
- Eliminates the need for screening of target site
- Overcomes variability in silencing by synthetic/IVT siRNA
- Cost-effective for functional genomic studies
PCR based siRNA expression cassettes:
- Ideal for screening siRNA sequences prior to cloning in a vector
- Rapid and inexpensive procedure